Controversy
Aug. 18th, 2006 12:55 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lurkittyWe realize that, you, the public rely on us to stay abreast of the latest developments. We were on top of this story as it arose. You have probably gathered, from our previous comments, that we have been less than supportive of TSA actions in the past. But we do appreciate the gravity of the current crisis facing the embattled airport securers: what to do about gel-insert brasiers.
"Ma'am, does your bra have gel inserts?" asks the blushing guard, who, only the previous day, had basked in blissful ignorance as his eyes lingered at the cleavage presented before him.
The confusion about rules and anger over having to throw away expensive little secrets from Victoria has grown as the days have worn on. It appears now that the TSA has given into pressure (probably from their girlfriends) and gel-inserts are allowed in the main cabin once more.
We are relieved.
"Ma'am, does your bra have gel inserts?" asks the blushing guard, who, only the previous day, had basked in blissful ignorance as his eyes lingered at the cleavage presented before him.
The confusion about rules and anger over having to throw away expensive little secrets from Victoria has grown as the days have worn on. It appears now that the TSA has given into pressure (probably from their girlfriends) and gel-inserts are allowed in the main cabin once more.
We are relieved.
